<- Back
Summary

How does a cap-and-trade scheme work?

Summary

Cap and trade schemes incentivize industries to cut carbon emissions through market mechanisms, establishing a carbon budget and issuing tradable carbon allowances. This system creates a financial incentive for reducing emissions and decarbonizing, with the price of allowances determined by supply and demand, encouraging investment in cleaner technologies.

Return to Blog
Sommaire
Book a call

The objective is straightforward: decarbonization. However, there are many ways to achieve it. Cap and trade schemes apply the free market laws of demand and supply - they incentivize industries to cut carbon emissions in the most optimal way they find feasible for their operations.

Setting the cap

It all starts with science

The foundation of any cap and trade scheme begins with scientific research. Scientists first determine the viable levels of global temperatures for Earth to remain inhabitable for human life. First, they quantify the impact of carbon emissions on global temperature rise. Then, they can establish how much carbon dioxide can be emitted over a specific period without exceeding these predetermined temperature thresholds.

Determining the carbon budget

With this information in hand, scientists can calculate a total carbon budget for a certain region. This budget represents the maximum amount of CO2 that can be released while still staying within safe temperature limits. Regulators then take this overall carbon budget and divide it into annual endowment, determining the maximum amount of CO2 that an economy can emit each year.

The division into annual budgets allows for better control and monitoring of carbon emissions over time. Industries are expected to gradually reduce their emissions to stay within these annual limits, making the transition to a low-carbon economy more manageable. The goal is to decarbonize progressively rather than forcing industries to stop emitting CO2 too abruptly, which could jeopardize economic stability.

Managing the budget wisely

The "cap" in a cap and trade system is the total limit on CO2 emissions set by regulators. This cap makes sure that the overall carbon budget is not exceeded. On top of this, regulators can monitor and control how much carbon is emitted each year, in other words, how the overall budget is consumed over time.

Executing the trade 

Creating financial incentives

It is not free to have the possibility to consume a part of the overall cap. The "trade" aspect of the cap and trade scheme means that there is a financial incentive for industries to reduce their emissions. Cap and trade schemes motivate industries to invest in greener technologies, the purpose being to still be able to afford producing similar volumes without being burdened by the cost of carbon. This is achieved by matching the carbon cap with tradable assets: here come carbon allowances.

Carbon allowances: a tradable commodity

In a cap and trade system, each tonne of CO2 from the carbon budget is linked to a tradable financial contract, a carbon allowance. For an industry to emit one tonne of CO2 (hence to have the possibility to consume a part of the overall carbon budget), it purchases one carbon allowance. This creates a direct cost for emitting carbon, incentivizing industries to find ways to reduce their emissions.

The trading mechanism

Beyond simply paying for the right to emit CO2, industries can also trade these carbon allowances. This is where the trading aspect comes into play. By creating a marketplace for carbon allowances, a price is established through the forces of supply and demand. Industries that can reduce their emissions more efficiently can sell their excess allowances to others, creating a financial incentive for continuous improvement in emission reduction.

Decarbonize thanks to the free market price discovery 

The price of carbon allowances is determined by market dynamics. As the cap on emissions is gradually lowered, the scarcity of carbon allowances increases, driving up their price. This price signal encourages industries to invest in cleaner technologies and reduce their carbon footprint.

Do you like this article?

Share it with your network and introduce Homaio to those interested in impact investing!

The Homing Bird

A newsletter to help you understand the key challenges of climate finance.

Sign up to our newsletter

Utimate guide to carbon markets

Dive into the world of carbon markets, where economics, finance, and environmental science converge. Get your ultimate guide now.

Thank You !
Find our guide with the following link 👉
Download whitepaper
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
White Paper homaio

Do you like this article?

Share it with your network and introduce Homaio to those interested in impact investing!

Understanding in depth

Responsible Savings Barometer: The French and Responsible Investment
May 12, 2025

Responsible Savings Barometer: The French and Responsible Investment

This article analyzes the findings of the Responsible Savings Barometer in France, highlighting the increasing awareness of environmental and social issues among the French regarding their savings. It reveals a gap between this interest and actual understanding of responsible investment products, while also exploring emerging solutions like carbon allowance purchases as a direct way to impact climate change. The piece emphasizes the need for greater transparency, education, and clearer regulations to foster the growth of truly transformative responsible savings.

Climate Tech: Definition, Key Innovations, and Investment Perspectives
May 9, 2025

Climate Tech: Definition, Key Innovations, and Investment Perspectives

This blog post provides a comprehensive overview of Climate Tech, tracing its roots back to the Cleantech boom of the 2000s and analyzing the reasons for its subsequent decline. It highlights the key differences between Cleantech and the modern Climate Tech movement, emphasizing a more focused approach on measurable climate impact, patient capital, and stronger alignment with markets and policies. The article details the emergence of a new ecosystem supporting Climate Tech, including specialized funds, corporate investments, and supportive government policies. However, it also sounds a note of caution, pointing to recent challenges like the Northvolt bankruptcy, shifts in political support, and a potential investor pivot towards AI. Ultimately, the article underscores that while Climate Tech holds immense promise for driving a sustainable economy, its future success hinges on the continued alignment of capital, government, and industry to overcome emerging hurdles.

ESG and SRI: Understanding the Differences and Adopting a Responsible Investment Strategy
May 7, 2025

ESG and SRI: Understanding the Differences and Adopting a Responsible Investment Strategy

The article distinguishes between ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) criteria, a broad and somewhat unstandardized framework for assessing non-financial factors in investments, and SRI (Socially Responsible Investment), specifically the French SRI Label. While ESG aims to evaluate long-term risks and opportunities, its lack of uniformity can lead to confusion. The SRI Label was created to standardize ESG integration but faced criticism for weak requirements. A 2025 reform strengthened it with stricter exclusions and demands. The article suggests that traditional ESG approaches lack quantifiable real-world impact, particularly on climate change, and introduces Homaio's alternative: investing directly in European emission allowances for a more tangible environmental effect.

Understanding in depth

No items found.

You might also like

Responsible Savings Barometer: The French and Responsible Investment
May 12, 2025

Responsible Savings Barometer: The French and Responsible Investment

This article analyzes the findings of the Responsible Savings Barometer in France, highlighting the increasing awareness of environmental and social issues among the French regarding their savings. It reveals a gap between this interest and actual understanding of responsible investment products, while also exploring emerging solutions like carbon allowance purchases as a direct way to impact climate change. The piece emphasizes the need for greater transparency, education, and clearer regulations to foster the growth of truly transformative responsible savings.

Climate Tech: Definition, Key Innovations, and Investment Perspectives
May 9, 2025

Climate Tech: Definition, Key Innovations, and Investment Perspectives

This blog post provides a comprehensive overview of Climate Tech, tracing its roots back to the Cleantech boom of the 2000s and analyzing the reasons for its subsequent decline. It highlights the key differences between Cleantech and the modern Climate Tech movement, emphasizing a more focused approach on measurable climate impact, patient capital, and stronger alignment with markets and policies. The article details the emergence of a new ecosystem supporting Climate Tech, including specialized funds, corporate investments, and supportive government policies. However, it also sounds a note of caution, pointing to recent challenges like the Northvolt bankruptcy, shifts in political support, and a potential investor pivot towards AI. Ultimately, the article underscores that while Climate Tech holds immense promise for driving a sustainable economy, its future success hinges on the continued alignment of capital, government, and industry to overcome emerging hurdles.

ESG and SRI: Understanding the Differences and Adopting a Responsible Investment Strategy
May 7, 2025

ESG and SRI: Understanding the Differences and Adopting a Responsible Investment Strategy

The article distinguishes between ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) criteria, a broad and somewhat unstandardized framework for assessing non-financial factors in investments, and SRI (Socially Responsible Investment), specifically the French SRI Label. While ESG aims to evaluate long-term risks and opportunities, its lack of uniformity can lead to confusion. The SRI Label was created to standardize ESG integration but faced criticism for weak requirements. A 2025 reform strengthened it with stricter exclusions and demands. The article suggests that traditional ESG approaches lack quantifiable real-world impact, particularly on climate change, and introduces Homaio's alternative: investing directly in European emission allowances for a more tangible environmental effect.

You might also like

No items found.