Green Investing: Why the Stock Market Is No Longer Enough (And How to Go Further)

For a long time, "green investing" simply meant buying shares in a "Clean Energy" ETF or selecting ESG-labeled funds (Environmental, Social, Governance).

This is a great first step. But as we approach 2026, with stock markets becoming increasingly volatile and the climate emergency accelerating, this strategy is showing its limits.

Today, the savvy investor must ask two questions:

1. Does my investment have a real impact on CO2?
2. Is my portfolio truly diversified?

Here is a comparative analysis between "classic" green investing (stocks) and the rising asset class: the European Carbon Market.

1. The Problem with "Green Stocks"

Investing in energy transition companies (wind, solar, hydrogen) seems logical. However, financially and ecologically, the reality is more nuanced.

Strong Correlation with the Global Market

Green stocks remain, first and foremost... stocks. They are subject to the same headwinds as the rest of the market: rising interest rates, inflation, and geopolitics.

• In practice: If the stock market crashes, your green stocks will likely fall too, even if the underlying company is virtuous. They do not offer true protection (hedging) against market risk.

The Question of Impact (Additionality)

When you buy a share of a green company on the secondary market (the stock exchange), you are buying that title from another investor, not from the company itself.

Key Takeaway: Your capital does not directly finance a new solar panel. You are supporting the share price, which is useful, but the impact on emissions is indirect and diluted.

[[cta-discover]]

2. The Carbon Market: True Green Diversification?

Faced with the limitations of equities, the Carbon Allowance market (EU ETS) is emerging as a powerful alternative for individuals. As of late 2025, market data confirms its relevance.

Performance and Decorrelation

Unlike stocks, the price of carbon depends on regulatory supply defined by the European Union, not on corporate earnings or Wall Street sentiment.

The Key 2025 Figure

While some renewable energy indices have suffered from interest rate volatility this year, the European Carbon Market has posted +16% growth Year-to-Date (YTD).

Even more interesting, we are observing a decoupling phenomenon. The carbon price no longer blindly follows gas or electricity prices. It follows its own scarcity dynamic. For an investor, this is the Holy Grail: an asset that does not behave like the others.

Mechanical Impact (The "Cap" Effect)

In the carbon market, impact is binary and guaranteed by law.

1. There is a limited number of rights to pollute (the Cap).
2. This number decreases every year. (The Commission has announced an 8% supply cut for 2026).
3. When you buy allowances via Homaio, you sequester them.

In plain English

Every tonne of CO2 in your portfolio is a tonne that cannot be emitted by an industrial polluter. You create scarcity that forces decarbonization. It is the most direct impact accessible to an individual.

‍

[[cta-impact]]

3. Comparison Table: Green Stocks vs. Carbon Allowances (Homaio)

To clarify, let's compare the two approaches.
‍

‍

4. How to Build a High-Performance "Green" Portfolio?

It’s not about opposing the two, but combining them. A modern wealth management strategy should include:

1. A Stock Foundation (World or ESG ETF) to benefit from long-term global economic growth.
2. An "Impact & Diversification" Pocket (Carbon) to seek uncorrelated performance and act concretely on climate.

The 2026 Opportunity

With the drastic reduction in quotas scheduled for 2026 (-8% supply) and record interest from institutional investment funds in this asset class, now is the opportune moment to diversify your savings.

By integrating Homaio carbon bonds into your portfolio, you are not betting on the success of a specific company, but on Europe's inevitable drive to reduce emissions.

The Bottom Line

Green investing is no longer just about "picking the right companies." It is now about understanding the macroeconomic mechanisms of the transition. Carbon is at the heart of this mechanism.

[[cta-simulateur]]

FAQ

Do ESG funds underperform?

Not necessarily, but their performance is highly linked to economic cycles and interest rates. They do not always offer the expected protection during market downturns.

Why is carbon called "uncorrelated"?

Because its price is driven by a political decision (reducing the number of allowances) rather than GDP growth or corporate results. Even in a recession, the supply of allowances will continue to fall.

Is investing in carbon riskier?

Like any financial asset offering yield, there is volatility. However, unlike a stock that can go bankrupt (go to zero), carbon is supported by European policy, which aims for prices high enough to force the transition.

‍

Disclaimer: Investing involves risks, including loss of capital and liquidity. Diversify your investments.

‍