The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) initially used free carbon allowances to educate stakeholders, protect industrial competitiveness, and ensure macroeconomic stability. As the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is introduced, the EU ETS is transitioning to a market-based approach, reducing the need for free allowances. This shift reflects a move towards a more global and environmentally driven system within green finance.
Carbon allowances are issued by regulators, with a portion allocated for free to covered installations. The EU ETS balances environmental goals with economic realities.
Teaching the rules of the game
Initially, free allocations were important for educating stakeholders about the EU ETS functioning. When the scheme was launched in 2005, as a novel system, these free allowances helped installation representatives learn about the cap-and-trade compliance mechanisms without immediate financial implications. This gradual approach minimized initial costs and facilitated a smoother transition to a fully operational market-based system.
[[cta-nl]]
Protectinging industrial competitiveness
Free allowances protect the competitiveness of European industries. Introducing a carbon cost too abruptly can significantly increase operational expenses for industries, leading to higher prices for EU products. This could disadvantage European businesses compared to those in regions without such stringent carbon costs, potentially leading to a loss of market share for the bloc. Free allowances act as a buffer, making sure that the transition to a carbon neutral economy does not harm European competitiveness.
[[cta-discover]]
Macroeconomic stability
Free allowances contribute to macroeconomic stability by preventing sudden spikes in energy production costs that could be driven by high carbon prices. By moderating these costs, the EU ETS helps to avoid inflationary pressures from rapidly rising energy prices. It is important for the EU bloc to keep a macroeconomic balance as it works towards its ambitious environmental objectives.
The debate over free EUAs
Free carbon allowances, within a scheme based on the "polluters pay" principle, have not always been well-received. Many stakeholders and NGOs argue that these allowances effectively weaken the EU ETS’ effectiveness and do not sufficiently drive industries to optimize operations and invest in greener technologies. Regulators have aimed to balance holding every installation accountable for its CO2 emissions with maintaining economic stability.
Free EUAs will not be needed in the future
While free allocations have been essential for the introduction and past evolution of the EU ETS, the system is now progressing. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is being introduced to address carbon leakage by imposing carbon costs on imports from countries with less stringent climate policies. As the role of free allowances in protecting EU competitiveness is no longer needed, the EU ETS is adopting a more global, exclusively market-based approach.
Do you like this article?
Share it with your network and introduce Homaio to those interested in impact investing!
By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
.avif)
.avif)
